Vehicle Classification – Class 10 vs. Class 10.1

Working on sole proprietor’s 2024 return.
Looked at 2023 return (completed by taxpayer) to see assets - noticed a pickup truck may have been incorrectly classified as a Class 10.1 asset, when it likely should have been Class 10.

Vehicle Details:

  • 2021 Ford F-150 Lariat 4WD SuperCrew (5.5’ box)
  • Body Type: Crew Cab Pickup, Short Bed
  • Seats: 5 passengers
  • Business Use: 98%
  • Purchased December 2022

Took a look at following CRA information:

Type of vehicle - Canada.ca


Based on above, it appears to be a motor vehicle under CRA definitions and should be categorized under Class 10, not Class 10.1.

Please note:

  • This vehicle was traded in in 2024. The 2023 closing UCC for this truck was $20k and the trade in allowance received for it in Feb 2024 was $40k.

Do others agree that this vehicle belongs in Class 10? If so, what approach would others take to rectify this?

I question first how it is used.
Are they in the business of transporting passengers 90%+? Class 10
Are they hauling goods 90%+? Class 10
Are the moving equipment to the job site 90%+? Class 10

If only to drive to and from locations and are not moving anything, then it could be Class 10.1. Could still be 10.1 if they are doing any of the above on a very limited basis.

1 Like

The taxpayer does not transport passengers or goods. He is an HVAC technician who works alone. I believe he is moving tools and equipment to the job site. Would that make it clear cut as Class 10?

I believe it’s also a test that is determined when you purchase the truck which may be important. Also ask what they did for HST/GST purposes.

1 Like

The Class 10.1 vehicle was disposed of in 2024 [Taxpayer completed their own return in 2023].

Below is the data entered for the vehicle in the 2024 T1 return.

Screenshots – 2024 T1

For class 10.1 asset entry:

  • Beginning Cost: $34,000.00 (capital cost limit in 2022 - year of acquisition)
  • Beginning UCC: $19,125.25 (closing UCC from 2023 T1)

Details regarding the disposition (February 28, 2024) of the Class 10.1 truck:

  • Trade-In Allowance: $40,000 received towards the purchase of a new truck.

T2125CCA

Schedule 3: Capital gain $6,000.00

Is this how others would input the data in the 2024 T1 return?

I think it likely he paid more than $ 40,000 for the truck?

1 Like

@Arliss

Just to clarify, the original purchase price of the truck was over $40,000.

However, the capital cost limit for Class 10.1 in 2022 (the year the truck was acquired) was $36,000.

As I recall, I think if you were to go back and recreate the original addition in TC you’d find the “cost” line isn’t = CCA limit?

1 Like

This is exactly what I thought would happen when one of my client started Uber in 2024. I didn’t know if TX would allow me to enter a number more than the UCC in the first year, I was thinking, just enter a figure equal to UCC in the first year if it doesn’t allow me to do that, for the recapture, and then on the S3, that’s where I enter the actual proceed and actual capital cost for the capital gian.

1 Like
  • Class 10.1 truck traded in for $40,000 (trade in allowance) in 2024
  • Original purchase price $50,000
  • Capital cost limit: $36,000 in 2022 (year of acquisition)

Does $4,000 excess over the limit create capital gain or does selling below purchase price mean no capital gain?

No capital gain or loss, and if class 10.1, no recapture or terminal loss

1 Like

I wasn’t going to think about it when it happens, but at the time, I was only thinking about what would happen if he changes the vehicle, I am thinking CRA would use whatever ruling to their favor. So it would make senses if there is no recapture or terminal loss, as the replacement property rule would kick in

It has nothing to do with the replacement property rule, it’s the rules for class 10.1 specifically. It doesn’t behave like other classes.

1 Like

And it does not have anything to do with class 10.1 since the truck is used in his HVAC business as was stated earlier.

1 Like

[ Profile - obhorst - protaxcommunity.com | obhorst ]
May 20

And it does not have anything to do with class 10.1 since the truck is used in his HVAC business as was stated earlier.

[ Vehicle Classification – Class 10 vs. Class 10.1 - #14 by obhorst | Visit Topic ] or reply to this email to respond.

In Reply To
[ Profile - iain.fyffe - protaxcommunity.com | iain.fyffe ]
May 20
It has nothing to do with the replacement property rule, it’s the rules for class 10.1 specifically. It doesn’t behave like other classes.

[ Vehicle Classification – Class 10 vs. Class 10.1 - #14 by obhorst | Visit Topic ] or reply to this email to respond.

You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.

To unsubscribe from these emails, [ | click here ] .